Compactness
Let be a metric space then
is compact if every open cover has a finite subcover
For subspaces definition holds identical for
Cantor's Intersection Theorem lemma
Suppose that is a compact metric space with nested sequence
where are non-empty closed subsets of then
so the intersection is nonempty
Proof
Suppose intersection is empty
So by complements (which are open sets) are an open cover of
Hence as the intersection is empty then the complements are an open cover ofBy compactness, then there exists a finite subcover
So for some the sets coverHowever as then covers (and equals)
However this is a contradiction as is non-empty
Compactness implies Sequential Compactness
Let be a metric space
Proof
Suppose is compact and suppose is a sequence of elements of
For each natural number define
So we have
Hence
Applying Cantor’s intersection theorem then
Let be a point in the intersection
Inductively construct a subsequence such thatHence as the
Suppose have already been constructed
As lies in , the closure of setIn particular there is some element of sequence at distance less than from
So take that as
Sequentially Compactness implies Compactness
Let be a metric space